Zitat von Maga-neu im Beitrag #820

---

Zitat von Indo_HS im Beitrag #818

---

Zitat von Landegaard im Beitrag #811

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #809

---

Es gibt aber bereits eine lange Liste von belegbaren Gruenden, die allesamt sehr viel schwerwiegender sind, als das, was seinerzeit bei Bill Clinton als impeachable offense angefuehrt wurde. Und die Liste wird taeglich laenger.[/blau]

---

Na dann, viel Glück.

---

Dazu benötigt es kein Glück, Landegaard (zumindest nicht viel davon).

Man braucht nur das zu registrieren und zusammen zu führen, was Trump fast schon täglich selbst liefert - nämlich zumeist verquirlte Scheiße.

Offenbar ist Ihnen das aber zu langweilig, weil das (zurecht) schon so viele andere machen ... darunter viele renommierte US-amerikanische Medien, Journalisten und Moderatoren, die sehr verantwortungsbewusst darüber aufklären. Sei´s drum.

---

Seit wann klärt die amerikanische Mainstreampresse über etwas verantwortungsbewusst auf? Klingt fast so, als würde Claus Kleber gute Anmoderationen machen. :-)

---

Rice Won’t Testify Before Senate Panel’s Hearing On Russian Election Meddling
Former national security adviser Susan Rice has declined to appear before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on Russian meddling in the presidential election, CNN reported Wednesday.

Her decision stemmed from the disagreement between Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who extended the decision to come before his panel on crime and terrorism, and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) over whether Rice’s appearance was necessary.
“Senator Whitehouse has informed us by letter that he did not agree to Chairman Graham’s invitation to Ambassador Rice, a significant departure from the bipartisan invitations extended to other witnesses,” Rice’s lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, wrote Graham in a letter obtained by CNN. “Under these circumstances, Ambassador Rice respectfully declines Senator Graham’s invitation to testify.”
Ruemmler added that Rice was “prepared to assist Congressional inquiries into Russian election interference because of the important national interests at stake, provided they are conducted in a bipartisan manner, and, as appropriate, in classified session.”

Graham told CNN earlier this week that he wanted to question Rice in order to determine if the Obama administration “tried to politicize intelligence.”
That allegation stems from reports that Rice had requested the unmasking of Trump officials who appeared in intelligence reports because they were swept up in routine surveillance of foreign nationals.

National security experts have said that if Rice made those requests, they would be germane to her work as a national security adviser trying to determine the extent of Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.
Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle who have viewed classified documents pertaining to the Russia investigation say they have yet to see evidence that Rice did anything unusual.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/su...-hearing-russia

Ethics Office Blows The Whistle on Sean Spicer’s Lie About Ivanka
Towards the end of March, the White House announced that President Trump’s oldest daughter was working out of a West Wing office, but that she would not be considered a government employee, even though she would have security clearance.

Sean Spicer assured reporters that she would follow all ethics rules and restrictions applying to federal employees and that she was acting “in consultation with the Office of Government Ethics.” Less than a week later, Ivanka’s position became official and she is now indeed an employee of the government, and the Ethics Office that Spicer claimed she consulted is now saying that they were, in fact, not consulted.

The rules require Ivanka Trump to disclose her financial holdings and either sell assets or recuse herself from matters in which she has a financial interest.
Shaub gave his account in a letter to Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Tom Carper of Delaware, who had asked him about the ethics rules for Ivanka Trump’s White House job.
http://www.bluedotdaily.com/ethics-offic...gn=facebook_NCT

The facts:
https://www.warren.senate.gov/files/docu...onse_Ivanka.pdf

Republicans Declare War On Cancer Patients By Creating A Real Death Panel
The Upton Amendment in the revised Republican health care bill isn't protection for people with preexisting conditions is a declaration of war on cancer patients that will force them into underfunded high-risk pools.

According to Larry Levitt of the Kaiser Family Foundation, “If you waive the community rating requirement in the ACA, insurers will charge people with pre-existing conditions astronomical premiums to make sure they’re priced out of the market entirely. $8 billion sounds like a lot of money. But, spread over five years and the potentially millions of people with pre-existing conditions in the individual market with a gap in insurance who would face very high premiums, it won’t go very far.”

The New York Times talked to cancer patients about their experiences in high-risk pools:

In the past, even the state high-risk pools proved an unaffordable solution to many people. Janice Elks, 50, a small-business owner in Omaha, had cervical cancer and suffered from neuropathy when she looked for a policy. “I could not get insurance at all, of any type, for years,” she said. “I would apply over and over.”

Her only option was Nebraska’s high-risk pool. Ms. Elks calculated it would cost her about $15,000 in premiums a year for a policy, while her medical expenses amounted to only a few thousand dollars a year for her seizure medications and some steroid shots. She now pays just $640 a month.
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/05/03/r...eath-panel.html

Gluecklicherweise haben ja nun mittlerweile auch die duemmsten Amerikaner Vergleichserfahrungen durch Obamacare fuer das, was da kommt.

UNDER TRUMPCARE, A 40-YEAR-OLD WITH METASTATIC CANCER WILL FACE A PREMIUM SURCHARGE OF $140,510
https://theintellectualist.co/trumpcare-...rcharge-140510/

Trump Administration Hires Official Whom Five Students Accused of Sexual Assault
As an upperclassman at The Citadel military college several years ago, Steven Munoz allegedly assaulted five freshmen. His hiring at the State Department raises further questions about the Trump administration’s vetting process.
https://www.propublica.org/article/trump...tent=1493830814

Zitat von Indo_HS im Beitrag #816

---

<<Republicans Close To Trump Say President Is Showing Signs Of Mental Illness>>
Republican strategist and MSNBC contributor Nicolle Wallace said that people outside of the administration who have spent time with Trump said that the president is showing signs of paranoia and delusion over his belief that Obama wiretapped him.
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/20/r...al-illness.html

Wenn das kein Grund für ein Impeachment ist, was dann?

---

Es ist unglaublich, wie Willie-Boy die Lügenpresse hier uns auftischt:
Erstens:
"In the latest move by insurers worried about the viability of the markets created under the federal health care law, Iowa’s major carrier said Monday that it would stop selling individual policies in the state next year."
"Aetna AET +0.03% said it will not offer individual coverage in Iowa in 2018 on the public exchange under the Affordable Care Act, as the large insurer further retreats from Obamacare."
Und das passiert in vielen Bundesstaaten.

Und nun zu "pre-existing conditions"
Die Gesetzesvorlage lässt diese Bedingung intakt.
Aber einzelne Bundesstaaten können, nach Erlaubnis, davon aussteigen. Nur in diesen Staaten kommen die 8 Milliarden Extra-Zuschuss in Frage. Und das auch nur für die, die 63 tage ohne Versicherung waren.

"Upton’s amendment adds $8 billion over five years aimed at helping people with pre-existing conditions afford their premiums in states that choose to repeal ObamaCare protections preventing sick people from being charged exorbitantly high premiums."

Enjoy the education:

6 Strongmen Trump Has Praised — And The Conflicts It Presents

http://www.npr.org/2017/05/02/526520042/...cts-it-presents

Zitat von Landegaard im Beitrag #831

---

Zitat von Indo_HS im Beitrag #816

---

<<Republicans Close To Trump Say President Is Showing Signs Of Mental Illness>>
Republican strategist and MSNBC contributor Nicolle Wallace said that people outside of the administration who have spent time with Trump said that the president is showing signs of paranoia and delusion over his belief that Obama wiretapped him.
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/20/r...al-illness.html

Wenn das kein Grund für ein Impeachment ist, was dann?

---

Was anderes. Ist so eine Sache mit der Behauptung von Geisteskrankheit. Wurde hierzulande von Medien wie der Zeit und dem Spiegel auch schon der gesamten Wählerschaft Trumps bescheinigt.

Man wird es belegen müssen und da bin ich mal gespannt, wie das geschehen soll.

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #834

---

Zitat von Landegaard im Beitrag #831

---

Zitat von Indo_HS im Beitrag #816

---

<<Republicans Close To Trump Say President Is Showing Signs Of Mental Illness>>
Republican strategist and MSNBC contributor Nicolle Wallace said that people outside of the administration who have spent time with Trump said that the president is showing signs of paranoia and delusion over his belief that Obama wiretapped him.
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/20/r...al-illness.html

Wenn das kein Grund für ein Impeachment ist, was dann?

---

Was anderes. Ist so eine Sache mit der Behauptung von Geisteskrankheit. Wurde hierzulande von Medien wie der Zeit und dem Spiegel auch schon der gesamten Wählerschaft Trumps bescheinigt.

Man wird es belegen müssen und da bin ich mal gespannt, wie das geschehen soll.

---

Vielleicht machen Willie und Indo einen Schnellkurs in Psychiatrie und werden von Hillary zum Dr-Gutachter ernannt.

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #832

---

Es ist unglaublich, wie Willie-Boy die Lügenpresse hier uns auftischt:
Erstens:
"In the latest move by insurers worried about the viability of the markets created under the federal health care law, Iowa’s major carrier said Monday that it would stop selling individual policies in the state next year."
"Aetna AET +0.03% said it will not offer individual coverage in Iowa in 2018 on the public exchange under the Affordable Care Act, as the large insurer further retreats from Obamacare."
Und das passiert in vielen Bundesstaaten.

Und nun zu "pre-existing conditions"
Die Gesetzesvorlage lässt diese Bedingung intakt.
Aber einzelne Bundesstaaten können, nach Erlaubnis, davon aussteigen. Nur in diesen Staaten kommen die 8 Milliarden Extra-Zuschuss in Frage. Und das auch nur für die, die 63 tage ohne Versicherung waren.

"Upton’s amendment adds $8 billion over five years aimed at helping people with pre-existing conditions afford their premiums in states that choose to repeal ObamaCare protections preventing sick people from being charged exorbitantly high premiums."

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #836

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #832

---

Es ist unglaublich, wie Willie-Boy die Lügenpresse hier uns auftischt:
Erstens:
"In the latest move by insurers worried about the viability of the markets created under the federal health care law, Iowa’s major carrier said Monday that it would stop selling individual policies in the state next year."
"Aetna AET +0.03% said it will not offer individual coverage in Iowa in 2018 on the public exchange under the Affordable Care Act, as the large insurer further retreats from Obamacare."
Und das passiert in vielen Bundesstaaten.

Und nun zu "pre-existing conditions"
Die Gesetzesvorlage lässt diese Bedingung intakt.
Aber einzelne Bundesstaaten können, nach Erlaubnis, davon aussteigen. Nur in diesen Staaten kommen die 8 Milliarden Extra-Zuschuss in Frage. Und das auch nur für die, die 63 tage ohne Versicherung waren.

"Upton’s amendment adds $8 billion over five years aimed at helping people with pre-existing conditions afford their premiums in states that choose to repeal ObamaCare protections preventing sick people from being charged exorbitantly high premiums."

---

Hey Dummer, wenn du wuesstest wovon du redest, dann waere dir klar, dass die besagten 8 Millionen hinten und vorne nicht reichen. Die Vorgehensweise ist ja alles nichts neues, sondern dieselbe Scheisse wie vor Obamacare. Risk pools never worked, the coverage never sufficed.
Entweder bist du so dumm dass du nichts weisst und begreifst -oder du bist einfach nur verlogen. Kannste dir aussuchen.

The Gangster in der GOP wissen genau, warum die ihren Plan nicht vor der Abstimmung vom CBO haben scoren lassen.

Congress is voting Thursday on a bill to replace Obamacare. The CBO still hasn’t scored it.
The House of Representatives will vote on the American Health Care Act, the bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, on Thursday in the early afternoon. House Republicans are hurtling toward a vote on a bill that is disliked by most Americans, opposed by nearly every major health care group, and not yet scored by the Congressional Budget Office.

This is an unusual situation, and a puzzling one. Republicans will vote tomorrow for a health care bill without knowing how many people it covers or how much it would cost. They risk setting themselves up for embarrassment when the numbers actually do come out and don't look good.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/...bo-score-absurd

---

Zitat von Indo_HS im Beitrag #825

---

Zitat von Maga-neu im Beitrag #820

---

Zitat von Indo_HS im Beitrag #818

---

Zitat von Landegaard im Beitrag #811

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #809

---

Es gibt aber bereits eine lange Liste von belegbaren Gruenden, die allesamt sehr viel schwerwiegender sind, als das, was seinerzeit bei Bill Clinton als impeachable offense angefuehrt wurde. Und die Liste wird taeglich laenger.[/blau]

---

Na dann, viel Glück.

---

Dazu benötigt es kein Glück, Landegaard (zumindest nicht viel davon).

Man braucht nur das zu registrieren und zusammen zu führen, was Trump fast schon täglich selbst liefert - nämlich zumeist verquirlte Scheiße.

Offenbar ist Ihnen das aber zu langweilig, weil das (zurecht) schon so viele andere machen ... darunter viele renommierte US-amerikanische Medien, Journalisten und Moderatoren, die sehr verantwortungsbewusst darüber aufklären. Sei´s drum.

---

Seit wann klärt die amerikanische Mainstreampresse über etwas verantwortungsbewusst auf? Klingt fast so, als würde Claus Kleber gute Anmoderationen machen. :-)

---

Eben seitdem ein apolitischer, von der eigenen Partei im Wahlkampf als "unqualifiziert für das Amt" bewerteter, rassistischer, korrupter und lügender Immobilienmakler und Selbstdarsteller wegen der fast noch dümmeren Wähler, die ihm auf den Leim gegangen waren, dummerweise Präsident der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika werden konnte ...

P.S.: Nichts gegen Klaus Kleber! Er schein manchmal tatsächlich etwas aufgeregt zu sein (oder gesundheitlich leicht angeschlagen?), aber das ist nur natürlich und für die Gesamtqualität zudem irrelevant.

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #837

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #836

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #832

---

Es ist unglaublich, wie Willie-Boy die Lügenpresse hier uns auftischt:
Erstens:
"In the latest move by insurers worried about the viability of the markets created under the federal health care law, Iowa’s major carrier said Monday that it would stop selling individual policies in the state next year."
"Aetna AET +0.03% said it will not offer individual coverage in Iowa in 2018 on the public exchange under the Affordable Care Act, as the large insurer further retreats from Obamacare."
Und das passiert in vielen Bundesstaaten.

Und nun zu "pre-existing conditions"
Die Gesetzesvorlage lässt diese Bedingung intakt.
Aber einzelne Bundesstaaten können, nach Erlaubnis, davon aussteigen. Nur in diesen Staaten kommen die 8 Milliarden Extra-Zuschuss in Frage. Und das auch nur für die, die 63 tage ohne Versicherung waren.

"Upton’s amendment adds $8 billion over five years aimed at helping people with pre-existing conditions afford their premiums in states that choose to repeal ObamaCare protections preventing sick people from being charged exorbitantly high premiums."

---

Hey Dummer, wenn du wuesstest wovon du redest, dann waere dir klar, dass die besagten 8 Millionen hinten und vorne nicht reichen. Die Vorgehensweise ist ja alles nichts neues, sondern dieselbe Scheisse wie vor Obamacare. Risk pools never worked, the coverage never sufficed.
Entweder bist du so dumm dass du nichts weisst und begreifst -oder du bist einfach nur verlogen. Kannste dir aussuchen.

The Gangster in der GOP wissen genau, warum die ihren Plan nicht vor der Abstimmung vom CBO haben scoren lassen.

Congress is voting Thursday on a bill to replace Obamacare. The CBO still hasn’t scored it.
The House of Representatives will vote on the American Health Care Act, the bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, on Thursday in the early afternoon. House Republicans are hurtling toward a vote on a bill that is disliked by most Americans, opposed by nearly every major health care group, and not yet scored by the Congressional Budget Office.

This is an unusual situation, and a puzzling one. Republicans will vote tomorrow for a health care bill without knowing how many people it covers or how much it would cost. They risk setting themselves up for embarrassment when the numbers actually do come out and don't look good.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/...bo-score-absurd

---

Milliarden, nicht Millionen, du Über-Klüger.

---

So let’s put the focus back where it belongs. Here’s what will happen if the American Health Care Act becomes law:

Tens of millions of Americans will lose health coverage: The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that 24 million people will lose health insurance by 2026 under an earlier version of Trumpcare. The Trump White House, meanwhile, estimates that 26 million will lose coverage over the next decade. And since Congress is currently debating a somewhat altered version of the bill that is harsher to people with pre-existing conditions, it is likely that the real number is even higher.

Tens of thousands of people will die every year who otherwise would have lived. A study of Massachusetts’ health reforms determined that “for every 830 adults gaining insurance coverage there was one fewer death per year.” If this figure is applied to the estimated 24 million who will lose health insurance under Trumpcare, that amounts to nearly 29,000 preventable deaths in 2026 alone among people who don’t have access to the medical care they need.

The poorest Americans will be the hardest hit. Trumpcare will reduce Medicaid spending by an estimated $880 billion over the next decade, according to the CBO. That’s a whole lot more than the cost of the Upton Amendment.

People with pre-existing conditions will suffer. The “MacArthur Amendment” to Trumpcare allows states to opt out of many of Obamacare’s protections for people with preexisting conditions. As a result, many individuals will no longer be able to obtain coverage.

Donald Trump make out like a bandit. While there are many losers under Trumpcare, there is one big winner — the rich.
https://thinkprogress.org/the-press-is-d...ge-be8acab95cf3

Trump administration moves to roll back Obamacare protections for trans people
Transgender and gender non-conforming people are often refused care simply because of who they are.
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-rescinds...re-3f6315b0ca52

The first raise of the debt ceiling:

House passes trillion-dollar bill to keep government funded through September
Vote kicks bill to Senate with time to approve it before midnight Friday deadline as White House says Trump will sign measure despite lack of border wall funds.

The House has passed a $1.1tn bill to fund the US government through the end of September, the first significant piece of bipartisan legislation of Donald Trump’s presidency.

Trump boasted: “This is what winning looks like.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017...us-house-senate

:-)))

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #842

---

The first raise of the debt ceiling:

House passes trillion-dollar bill to keep government funded through September
Vote kicks bill to Senate with time to approve it before midnight Friday deadline as White House says Trump will sign measure despite lack of border wall funds.

The House has passed a $1.1tn bill to fund the US government through the end of September, the first significant piece of bipartisan legislation of Donald Trump’s presidency.

Trump boasted: “This is what winning looks like.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017...us-house-senate

:-)))

---

Zitat von nahal im Beitrag #843

---

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #842

---

The first raise of the debt ceiling:

House passes trillion-dollar bill to keep government funded through September
Vote kicks bill to Senate with time to approve it before midnight Friday deadline as White House says Trump will sign measure despite lack of border wall funds.

The House has passed a $1.1tn bill to fund the US government through the end of September, the first significant piece of bipartisan legislation of Donald Trump’s presidency.

Trump boasted: “This is what winning looks like.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017...us-house-senate

:-)))

---

Man sollte nicht vergessen zu sagen:
Das ist noch Obamas-Budget, dass er nicht ganz durchgekriegt hat.

---

Racists, slavery apologists, and white nationalists knew exactly what Trump was saying about the Civil War
By questioning the cause of the Civil War, Trump was blowing a dog whistle to white nationalists & neo-confederates

Trump’s remarks were largely panned for being “puzzling” and “fact-free.” But as historians warned would happen, white nationalist media figures praised his comments, saying that Trump was “right about the UnCivil War” and that “none of the modern wars have advanced the White race and our shared civilization.”

By questioning the cause of the Civil War, Trump was blowing a dog whistle to white nationalist media figures and neo-Confederates, tacitly supporting the revisionist history they promote. The white nationalist website VDare, for example, has claimed that the idea that the Civil War was meant to “preserve the Union and free the slaves” is a “lie.” White nationalists have also attempted to dismiss the traumas of slavery, writing that it “wasn’t as bad as you were taught.” So when Trump suggested that the war could have been avoided or that the cause was unknown, he was echoing the sentiments of white nationalists by diminishing the impact slavery had in the United States.
http://www.salon.com/2017/05/04/racists-...il-war_partner/

Natuerlich. Das rassistische, misogyne, dumme, fanatische und verlogene Pack wird immer und ueberall vom selben Dreck angezogen.

GOP Lawmaker Just Got Outed As The Founder Of Popular Pro-Rape Group
http://politicaldig.com/gop-lawmaker-jus...pro-rape-group/

Trump’s “religious liberty” executive order is meant to legalize anti-LGBT discrimination — and may be unconstitutional
New order will likely grant broad rights to refuse service or jobs to LGBT people or women who have had abortions
http://www.salon.com/2017/05/04/trumps-r...constitutional/

Clergy members warn that Donald Trump’s religious liberty executive order will “harm others in the name of those beliefs”
The order is called "nothing more than a license-to-discriminate order that puts millions of LGBTQ people at risk"
http://www.salon.com/2017/05/03/clergy-m...-those-beliefs/

https://www.clergyunitedagainstdiscrimination.org/

Trump wird den Papst besuchen. Gut, vielleicht können dann die Beziehungen normalisiert werden. Vielleicht kann der Papst dann "super partes" sein, statt der Anti-Trump zu sein, wie die NYT schreibt.

Zitat von Maga-neu im Beitrag #847

---

Trump wird den Papst besuchen. Gut, vielleicht können dann die Beziehungen normalisiert werden. Vielleicht kann der Papst dann "super partes" sein, statt der Anti-Trump zu sein, wie die NYT schreibt.

---

This is so funny.:-)

House GOPers To Celebrate Big-League At WH After Passing O’Care Repeal
House Republicans and President Donald Trump are planning on having a celebration at the White House, and a Bud Light or two, if they pass a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare on Thursday afternoon.

Trump has apparently delayed his plans to travel to New York City by a few hours, and the White House has sent transportation to the Capitol so that House Republicans may quickly dash off to a party at the White House.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/re...bamacare-repeal

Die wissen ganz offensichtlich nicht was sie tun. Mal sehen, wer sich von denen in einigen Monaten noch an diese White House celebration erinnern will.:-)

Wenn Trump ein Gesetzentwurf durchbringt = Misserfolg
Wenn Trump ein Gesetzentwurf nicht durchbringt = Misserfolg.

Was Tatsache ist:
Eine erste Hürde ist genommen. Wie das Gesetz endgültig aussehen wird weiß keiner, der Senat wird seinen Senf noch dazu geben.